Difference between PyCharm vs VSCode?

Difference between PyCharm vs VSCode

Python is a multi-valent programming language. Developers prefer working in market-leading technologies such as AI, ML, Big Data, etc. using python. It is used to develop complex applications for both desktop and web. The language is designed with enhanced capabilities that facilitate data visualization and analytics. If you are a beginner and excited to learn python, the very first question that could come into your mind will be; Which is the right IDE for python?

There has always been a competition between two high-end Python IDEs. PyCharm by Jetbrains and Visual Studio Code by Microsoft are the two most popular IDEs that are widely used by python developers. In this article, we’ll look into the features and characteristics of each of them to get an overview of their contribution to scalable software development.



It is a feature-filled IDE specifically for python development. It is written in both Python and Java and provides enhanced features and functions. It makes coding, building, testing, and debugging easy for software developers. Other than the code editor, PyCharm incorporates an interpreter and compiler, code profiler, plugin support, debugger, integrations, and many other functions that make software development up to the mark and application requirements.

Visual Studio

It is an open-source editor built using an Electron framework. It is written in Node.js and Javascript. It is a lightweight code editor that can be customized as per the application requirements. A feature-packed software is capable of supporting a range of programming languages that can be integrated using the extensions and plugins. Microsoft Python is the extension that can be downloaded in VSCode for programming in the Python language.

PyCharm Community Edition vs VSCode

Is PyCharm better than VSCode? – a most common question by the developers. PyCharm vs VSCode for beginners is one of the most critical concerns for developers to get started with the IDE that meets their expectations and needs for the applications. Below is a detailed comparison of PyCharm and VSCode to identify the attributes that define the quality of the IDE.

Common Features of IDEs

Both the IDEs provide an array of features for the development of applications. These include:

  • Full-text search
  • Git integration
  • Coe compilation
  • Debugging
  • Code formatting
  • Code inspection
  • Syntax management
  • Code snippets

However, when it comes to the comparison of two state-of-the-art IDEs for python development, there are crucial attributes that need to be taken into consideration. PyCharm vs VSCode has advanced Django support in PyCharm. While developing cutting-edge technologies and intelligence models, PyCharm vs VSCode for machine learning is a key concern for developers. The reason corresponds to the performance metrics that could help compile the huge learning models in a matter of milliseconds.



Performance is a primary parameter while choosing an IDE for development. Code execution in less time with required functionality is the ultimate desire of every developer. The comparison of VSCode and PyCharm deduces the Visual Studio Code faster. It keeps the code editor, response time, startup time, and memory footprint very seamless. It allows a wide range of extensions to be integrated into the software to provide multiplied capabilities. On the other hand, PyCharm is extremely slow relatively.


PyCharm vs VSCode for data science has enhanced requirements. Both of the IDEs support a wide range of addons and extensions to serve the developer community. Visual Studio code only needs to know about the project that is been created and it enables the plugins accordingly. Whereas, for PyCharm the IDEs should be set up for programming languages other than python. The comparison with respect to extensions thus also adds a mark to VSCode.


PyCharm provides the extensibility feature through plugins. It currently supports around 3000 extensions that are listed on the JetBrains website. On the other hand, VSCode provides extensions for almost every function. It is simple for developers to employ the extension on their own and make the project highly scalable. The huge AI and ML models require additional functionalities to scale up the project. VSCode marketplace contains all the extensions that make it more extensible than PyCharm.

Resource Consumption

Is your IDE compatible with your machine?
Though the capabilities of IDEs are almost the same. However, they vary with respect to resource consumption, they utilize the RAM and CPU differently. Visual Studio Code utilizes the resources efficiently as compared to PyCharm. It ultimately affects their performance and the extensibility when it comes to developing huge projects.

Ease of use

PyCharm has some advanced features such as code refactoring tools that are hard to figure out by developers at the very beginning. It means that the IDE lacks the aspect of ease of use in its functionality due to its complex configurations. However, on the other hand, VSCode is much easy to use. It provides shortcut keys to search any feature that you require and can be implemented without additional overhead.


One of the most discussed factors is the pricing of the IDEs that makes them stand for developers for regular use. The price of PyCharm is around $200 a year. It has a community version that is free to use commercially. However, that version lacks features such as advanced Django, CSS, Javascript, and online debugging support. VSCode, on the other hand, is Free and Open-source software (FOSS).In a nutshell, the extensive comparison of PyCharm and VSCode concludes the VSCode more compatible and suitable for developers. Due to its scalability, it is the number one choice of developers for their software development. However, it varies according to the requirements of the software application based on which the developer can use the most suitable IDE.

About Author

Want to take your business to new heights? Then start today and get free development credits.